District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/8/2006
Sears v. State
Citations
- 920 So. 2d 709
- 2006 WL 436115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming judgment and sentence entered pursuant to plea based on determination that the court's ruling on his motion to suppress was not dispositive
- affirming judgment and sentence entered pursuant to plea based on determination that the court’s ruling on his motion to suppress was not dispositive
- on mot. for reh’g and/or clarification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- M.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-26· cited 19×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-04· cited 10×
- Ruilova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-28· cited 7×
- Ferran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-02· cited 1×
- Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-06· cited 1×
- MN v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-26
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.