Searles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the giving of the presumption of impairment instruction was harmless error when “there is sufficient evidence of actual impairment such that there is no doubt that the jury would have found impairment even without the erroneous instruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cardenas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-02-26· cited 26×
• State v. Cameron
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-19· cited 2×
• Searles v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-30· cited 1×
• Searles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-19

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• State v. Bender
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-03· cited 104×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-16· cited 61×
• State v. Miles
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-30· cited 39×
• Servis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-26· cited 8×
• McBride v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-20· cited 7×
• Bonine v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 6×
• Hembree v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-03· cited 4×
• Bass v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-07· cited 4×
• Searles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-15· cited 1×
• Holmes-Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-13· cited 1×