District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/9/2008
Searcy v. State
Citations
- 971 So. 2d 1008
- 2008 WL 80164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts must strictly comply with rule 3.830
- holding that courts must strictly comply with rule 3.830
- reversing the trial court’s summary denial of the defendant’s pro se rule 3.170(Z) motion; ordering that an evidentiary hearing be conducted; and ordering the appointment of conflict-free counsel based upon the defendant’s allegation of misrepresentations made by counsel
- “Many courts have held, and we agree, that an indigent defendant has the right to court-appointed counsel to assist in the Sling of a [rule 3.170] motion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Ramirez, and Suarez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. TigueKentucky Supreme Court· 2015-05-14· cited 48×
- Noel Plank v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-03-17· cited 17×
- State of Florida v. Alex Diaz de la PortillaSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-11-05· cited 10×
- Al-Hakim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-09· cited 9×
- J.A.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-14· cited 8×
- Wendt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-02· cited 7×
- Plank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-29· cited 6×
- A.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-02· cited 5×
- Escobar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-29· cited 3×
- Phelps v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-31· cited 3×
- Pole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-10· cited 2×
- CAMON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-12· cited 1×
- Brosnan P. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-24· cited 1×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-22· cited 1×
- Searcy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-10
- Y.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-19
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,309×
- Padgett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 49×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-23· cited 33×
- Wofford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-17· cited 22×
- Schriber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-05· cited 20×
- Garrett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-18· cited 18×
- O'NEAL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-20· cited 17×
- Lester v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-16· cited 14×
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-19· cited 14×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-18· cited 12×
- Sandoval v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-30· cited 11×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-16· cited 10×
- Eulo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-11· cited 9×
- Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-07· cited 9×
- Tompkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-01-20· cited 8×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-20· cited 7×
- Hulick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-12· cited 7×
- Mosley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-11· cited 7×
- Gaston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-06· cited 6×
- Amaya v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-19· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.