Skip to main content

Searcy v. State

Citations

  • 971 So. 2d 1008
  • 2008 WL 80164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts must strictly comply with rule 3.830
  • holding that courts must strictly comply with rule 3.830
  • reversing the trial court’s summary denial of the defendant’s pro se rule 3.170(Z) motion; ordering that an evidentiary hearing be conducted; and ordering the appointment of conflict-free counsel based upon the defendant’s allegation of misrepresentations made by counsel
  • “Many courts have held, and we agree, that an indigent defendant has the right to court-appointed counsel to assist in the Sling of a [rule 3.170] motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Ramirez, and Suarez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.