Norman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court has consistently held that, ‘once a defendant indicates his desire to avail himself of the rule 3.170(i) procedure, the trial court must appoint conflict-free counsel to advise and assist the defendant in this regard.’”
• reversing and remanding \to effectuate Norman's right to counsel\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Searcy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-09· cited 24×
• Schriber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-05· cited 20×
• Mosley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-11· cited 7×
• Mullins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-27· cited 3×
• Banks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-27· cited 3×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-13· cited 2×
• Grier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-08· cited 1×
• ANTONIO JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-08· cited 1×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-26

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wofford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-17· cited 22×
• Lester v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-16· cited 14×