S.D. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding rule 8.090(m)(3) substantively indistinguishable from rule 3.191(p)(3), and that the rule 3.191(p)(3) analysis in Salzero applies to rule 8.090(m)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. D.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-22· cited 8×
• State v. D.O.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-09· cited 1×
• State v. DA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Salzero
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-18· cited 11×
• State v. C.A.J.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 2×