State v. Salzero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where trial date was set eleven (11) days after initial hearing on motion for discharge but defendant was brought to trial a total of fourteen (14
• “We hold that a violation of the five and ten-day periods provided in rule 3.191(p)(3) is harmless if a defendant is actually brought to trial within fifteen days of filing his notice of expiration.”
• “We hold that a violation of the five and ten-day periods provided in rule 3.191(p)(3) is harmless if a defendant is actually brought to trial within fifteen days of filing his notice of expiration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).