Washington Supreme Court· 10/10/1963
Scudero v. Todd Shipyards Corp.
Citations
- 385 P.2d 551
- 63 Wash. 2d 46
- 1963 Wash. LEXIS 516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \the substantive rules of the maritime law apply to the action whether the proceeding be instituted in an admiralty or in a common law or state court\
- stating that “the substantive rules of the maritime law apply to the action whether the proceeding be instituted in an admiralty or in a common law or state court”
- declining to follow Ninth Circuit precedent on related maintenance issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court· 1979-11-01· cited 84×
- Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1971-09-02· cited 69×
- Vogel v. Alaska Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1966-10-06· cited 33×
- Cammon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 2000-12-21· cited 29×
- Willapa Trading Co. v. Muscanto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-11-03· cited 20×
- Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. McDougaldMississippi Supreme Court· 1969-11-10· cited 15×
- Lundborg v. Keystone Shipping Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 10×
- Pasternack v. LubetichCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-05-20· cited 4×
- Lundborg v. Keystone Shipping Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-09· cited 2×
- In Re Estate of ScardigliWashington Supreme Court· 1970-04-16
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 1,014×
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court· 1953-12-07· cited 1,000×
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1924-04-07· cited 561×
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court· 1942-12-14· cited 515×
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1939-01-03· cited 354×
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court· 1922-01-03· cited 343×
- The Max MorrisSupreme Court· 1890-11-07· cited 204×
- Carlisle Packing Co. v. SandangerSupreme Court· 1922-05-29· cited 189×
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court· 1860-02-13· cited 130×
- New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court· 1922-02-27· cited 124×
- Thames Towboat Co. v. the Schooner \Francis McDonald\Supreme Court· 1920-12-06· cited 119×
- The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court· 1935-06-03· cited 111×
- Leathers v. BlessingSupreme Court· 1882-05-18· cited 105×
- Panama Railroad v. VasquezSupreme Court· 1926-06-07· cited 91×
- Minnie v. Port Huron Terminal Co.Supreme Court· 1935-06-03· cited 76×
- The Propeller CommerceSupreme Court· 1862-02-10· cited 61×
- Gonsalves v. Moose Dry Dock & Repair Co.Supreme Court· 1924-11-17· cited 59×
- Cline v. PriceWashington Supreme Court· 1951-12-27· cited 8×
- Lundgren v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1918-07-08· cited 6×
- Swanson v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1916-08-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.