Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 5/25/1988
Scott v. Willis
Citations
- 543 A.2d 165
- 116 Pa. Commw. 327
- 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Allegations of ‘gross and culpable negligence’ and “wanton and reckless behavior’ are not the legal equivalent of willful and intentional misconduct.”
- \[A]llegations of `gross and culpable negligence' and `wanton and reckless behavior' are not the legal equivalent of willful and intentional misconduct.\
- sexual assault victim’s claim barred despite claiming that isolated room facilitated the assault and constituted a defect of real estate
- Section 8550 considered in suit by teacher against individual school district officials
- Section 8550 considered in suit by teacher against individual school district officials
- conduct of school district employees in permitting teacher to cover up windows of his office with posters did not bring district within real property exception for sexual assaults committed in office by teacher upon grade school students
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle, Barry, Narick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Envirotest Partners v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-17· cited 62×
- Palmer v. BartoshCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-23· cited 34×
- Factor v. GoodeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-25· cited 34×
- Heinly v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-26· cited 33×
- McNeal v. City of EastonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-22· cited 33×
- Weinstein v. BullickE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-06-15· cited 32×
- Pettit v. NamieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-10· cited 28×
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-02-16· cited 24×
- Stoneking v. Bradford Area School DistrictThird Circuit· 1988-09-12· cited 19×
- Doe v. Methacton School DistrictE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-03-16· cited 9×
- Alston v. PW-Philadelphia WeeklyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-09-02· cited 9×
- Benson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-16· cited 8×
- Edison Learning, Inc. v. School District of PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-10-21· cited 7×
- Betz v. SattesonM.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-04-25· cited 4×
- Kathleen Stoneking v. Bradford Area School DistrictThird Circuit· 1988-09-12· cited 1×
- Pursel v. Parkland School DistrictLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-01-11· cited 1×
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-05-19· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 1,332×
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-07· cited 406×
- Jensen v. ConradFourth Circuit· 1984-10-05· cited 94×
- Swartz v. MasloffCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-23· cited 33×
- DeSantis v. SwigartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-05· cited 28×
- Ziccardi v. School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-12· cited 26×
- Robinson v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-09-29· cited 21×
- La Plant v. FrazierE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-04-20· cited 19×
- Dudosh v. City of AllentownE.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-12-18· cited 16×
- McCreary v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-26· cited 13×
- Hood v. New Jersey Department of Civil ServiceThird Circuit· 1982-06-10· cited 10×
- Easton Area Joint Sewer Authority v. Bushkill-Lower Lehigh Joint Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-03· cited 9×
- Weissman v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-01· cited 8×
- Walker v. ComayW.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-07-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.