Heinly v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the “fact pleading” requirement in Pa. R.C.P. No. 1019(a) to a Section 1983 complaint
• discussing a similar case where the prisoner plaintiff alleged constitutional violations under the form of tortious conduct
• noting courts are presumed to know the law and a petitioner, in particular one proceeding pro se, is not required to specify the legal theory underlying his action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).