Scott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not essential, in order to sustain the conviction of appellant, that he should have been identified at the trial, by positive or direct evidence, as the guilty person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lewis v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1969-08-29· cited 46×
• Rogers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-03-01· cited 21×
• Howard v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-12-17· cited 2×
• Buford v. Doe
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1968-08-27· cited 2×
• Thomas J. Mure v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-05-19

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Tait v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-03-13· cited 81×
• Wright v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1958-01-30· cited 63×
• Capps v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1967-10-02· cited 55×
• Stock v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1966-09-22· cited 48×
• Hayden v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1964-06-12· cited 37×
• Fisher v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1966-09-22· cited 33×
• Wojcik v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1965-03-10· cited 32×
• Coffer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1958-12-10· cited 22×
• Mason v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-07-08· cited 11×
• Donaldson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1952-12-08· cited 9×
• Spiker v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1966-09-30· cited 4×