Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1/11/2001
Scott v. State
Citations
- 36 S.W.3d 240
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 221
- 2001 WL 26109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Texas’s statutory rape statute does not violate due process and furthers legitimate interest in protecting the health and safety of children
- holding that Texas = s statutory rape statute does not violate due process and furthers legitimate interest in protecting the health and safety of children
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schneider, Taft, Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte MoralesTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-07· cited 60×
- Mark Fleming v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-08-02· cited 32×
- Sonny Ray Byrne v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-11-16· cited 27×
- Tomas Jimenez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-12-17· cited 14×
- Mark Fleming v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-08-05· cited 7×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-03-09· cited 6×
- Freeman, Corey Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-09-10· cited 5×
- Jacobs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-08-24· cited 3×
- Ex Parte Santiago Morales Jr.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-07-21
- Jerome Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-01-12
- Nathaniel David Jennings v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2011-12-15
- Thomas Wayne Florence v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-07-30
- Jake Robert Jacobs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-03-03
- Justin Robert Parker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2016-06-13
- Christopher Steven Painter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2017-12-21
- Ex Parte Colten AdamTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2020-03-18
- Ex Parte Isaac Humphrey v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2024-11-05
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-11-29· cited 1,064×
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1958-01-27· cited 895×
- Duron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-08· cited 440×
- People v. CashMichigan Supreme Court· 1984-07-19· cited 78×
- United States v. Michael Clarence RansomTenth Circuit· 1991-08-21· cited 68×
- State v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-08-30· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-03-08· cited 54×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-03-25· cited 49×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-12· cited 47×
- Goodrow v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-06-27· cited 37×
- State v. TagueSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-09-23· cited 36×
- State v. YanezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1998-08-04· cited 32×
- State v. StokelySupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-11-24· cited 29×
- State v. GranierSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-07-06· cited 22×
- Duron v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-01-25· cited 19×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-11-16· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.