Supreme Court of Colorado· 6/5/2006

Scott v. Scott

Citations

136 P.3d 892
2006 WL 1520290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing the “unique circumstances presented by probate actions” when it comes to determining the scope of proceedings
relying, in part, on the fact that the probate court used the same case number 11 for multiple pleadings to hold that the pleadings did not initiate independent proceedings within the meaning of section 3-107
“When confronted with circumstances where the jurisdiction of the court of appeals is uncertain, [the supreme court] ha[s] generally required [R]ule 54(b) certification.”
in determining whether a rule of civil procedure applies to a provision of the probate code, we “look first to the underlying purposes and policies of the probate code”
“The probate court is in a better position than the appellate court to evaluate the status of a proceeding and to determine whether a claim is ripe for review[.]”
r ecognizing that, while an “initial petition outlines a set of claims and begins a proceeding, ” 11 subsequent pleadings that “relate to that set of claims are part of the same proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.