Skip to main content
· 12/24/2009

In RE ESTATE OF McCREATH

Citations

  • 240 P.3d 413
  • 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 1962
  • 2009 WL 4981894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the Rule 56(b) order had a final, dis-positive effect as to claims pending in the litigation and the order essentially constituted a partial summary judgment under Rule 56(a), it was properly certified under C.R.C.P. 54(b)
  • treating an order issued under C.R.C.P. 56(h) that had a “final, dispositive effect” on pending claims as a partial summary judgment, subject to de novo review
  • “[A] quitclaim deed is ineffective to transfer a title not vested in the transferor at the time of its execution.”
  • the power to revoke cannot be exercised through a will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy, Miller, Marquez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.