Scott v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court is not required to consider “such an uncertain source of funds as future gifts” in making an alimony award
• “A cash award is in certain cases a very useful device.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hanson v. Hanson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-10-13· cited 76×
• Holmes v. Holmes
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-07-05· cited 52×
• Mika v. Mika
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-02-24· cited 44×
• Foraker v. Foraker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-03-30· cited 40×
• Díaz v. Rafael Alcalá
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1996-05-28· cited 36×
• In Re Nassar
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-03-07· cited 31×
• Marriage of Lyles v. Lyles
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-04-22· cited 25×
• Hughes v. Hughes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-20· cited 22×
• In Re Marriage of Schatz
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-03-20· cited 21×
• Williams v. Williams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-24· cited 11×
• Kunkel v. Kunkel
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-09-25· cited 7×
• Gassaway v. Gassaway
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-22· cited 7×
• In Re Marriage of Denton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-24· cited 5×
• Skaggs v. Skaggs
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-12-30· cited 5×
• Ingebritson v. Ingebritson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-09-18· cited 5×
• Davolt v. Davolt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-01-31· cited 5×
• In re Marriage of Studyvin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-11-02· cited 4×
• Reeves v. Reeves
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-06-20· cited 4×
• Moody v. Moody
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-02-10· cited 2×
• Earle v. Earle
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-04-11· cited 2×