Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/6/2005

Scott v. Ranch Roy-L, Inc.

Citations

182 S.W.3d 627
2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1816
2005 WL 3286661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating “it is perhaps the wisest course to have such an explicit statement in the affidavit”
“Plaintiffs cannot challenge the validity of that assignment on the basis that it violated the Statute of Frauds because they were not parties to the assignment.”
“To the extent that the affidavits contained inadmissible hearsay and/or conclusory statements, the trial court erred in not granting plaintiffs’ motion in the alternative to strike such inadmissible material from the affidavits.”
\Legal conclusions are not admissible facts.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clifford H. Ahrens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Scott v. Ranch Roy-L, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Scott v. Ranch Roy-L, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-10-16· cited 4×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.