Keisker v. Farmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insured could keep lost profits to the extent it could prove that these profits represented uninsured losses
• explaining that an insurer’s “subrogation recovery must be reduced by its share of litigation expenses”
• “Subrogation exists to prevent unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).