Skip to main content

Scott v. Purcell

Citations

  • 399 A.2d 1088
  • 264 Pa. Super. 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recovery allowed on claim of unjust enrichment against corporation even in absence of proof of wrongdoing on part of corporation
  • agency relationship existed where agent’s “activities . . . strongly suggest that he was acting as [principal’s] agent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Hoffman, Cer-Cone, Price, Van Voort, Spaeth, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.