Skip to main content
· 2/26/1982

Birchwood Lakes Community Ass'n v. Comis

Citations

  • 442 A.2d 304
  • 296 Pa. Super. 77
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that covenant to pay annual maintenance dues which extended to “Grantee ... heirs, successors, executors, administers and assigns” were clearly intended to run with the land
  • referring to the property owners' association that performed the \services essential to the maintenance of the community\ as the \successor in interest to the developer\
  • rejecting defendant’s attempt to frame obligation of paying maintenance fees as a restrictive covenant “in the hope that a standard of review more favorable to their position will be applied,” and instead applying the standards applicable to nonrestrictive covenants
  • “If a plaintiff fails to succeed in his claim based on an express contract he may not then attempt to demonstrate a contract implied in fact unless such has been averred in the complaint.”
  • “if a plaintiff fails to prove a cause of action on an express contract, he may not then attempt to prove his case in quasi contract, unless his complaint originally, or as amended sets forth a cause of action in quasi contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hester, Cavanaugh and Van Der Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.