Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 3/29/2019

Scott Gibson v. Bryan Collier

Citations

  • 920 F.3d 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disagreement with treatment does not constitute deliberate indifference
  • explaining that “the WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate”
  • explaining that “the WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate”
  • noting that “the WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate”
  • rejecting a claim of deliberate indifference where the inmate could not show a “consensus in the medical community” about a particular course of treatment
  • “[T]he WPATH Standards of Care reflect not consensus, but merely one side in a sharply contested medical debate over [GCS].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James, Smith, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.