Customs and Patent Appeals· 6/11/1928
Schweitzer v. United States
Citations
- 16 Ct. Cust. 285
- 1928 WL 28008
- 1928 CCPA LEXIS 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- endless belts without which a paper-making machine would be incapable of performing its important, ordinary and proper function of making tissue grade paper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barber, Bland, Graham, Hatfield, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Janson Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1928-11-19· cited 22×
- United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1933-12-30· cited 19×
- John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1958-05-21· cited 16×
- Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1952-05-06· cited 15×
- United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1962-02-01· cited 13×
- Universal Foreign Service, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1961-12-07· cited 9×
- Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1962-05-03· cited 9×
- Harding Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1936-01-06· cited 8×
- Schwarz v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1968-05-08· cited 6×
- United American Bosch Corp. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1938-06-28· cited 5×
- United States v. American Express Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1941-06-09· cited 5×
- F. T. Griswold Mfg. Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1956-01-12· cited 5×
- Ratsey Lapthorn, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1951-02-20· cited 4×
- Greenberg v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1954-03-04· cited 4×
- Seawol Corp. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1954-01-28· cited 4×
- Cody Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1954-10-21· cited 4×
- Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1957-09-25· cited 4×
- Charles Garcia & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1960-06-23· cited 4×
- Tropi-Cal v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1969-12-24· cited 4×
- Boll v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1955-06-09· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1926-02-25· cited 51×
- United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1926-05-22· cited 47×
- Welte v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1914-02-27· cited 40×
- Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1924-03-03· cited 17×
- Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1919-04-18· cited 12×
Other cases named Schweitzer v. United States
8 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Schweitzer v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-07-18· cited 36×
- Schweitzer v. United StatesD. Nebraska· 1961-03-04· cited 18×
- Schweitzer v. United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-12-02· cited 1×
- Schweitzer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24
- Schweitzer v. United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-12-02
- Schweitzer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-06-27
- Schweitzer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24
- Schweitzer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.