Harding Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]efore imported merchandise shall be regarded as parts of an article the identity of the individual article must be fixed with certainty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1999-09-20· cited 90×
• Storewall, LLC v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2009-12-18· cited 6×
• Ludvig Svensson (U.S.) Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1999-08-17· cited 4×
• Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2006-12-21· cited 1×
• Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2025-01-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schweitzer v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1928-06-11· cited 57×
• United States v. Lyon
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1913-11-11· cited 44×
• United States v. Wanamaker
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1929-02-16· cited 33×
• United States v. Cartier (Inc.)
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1927-12-05· cited 23×
• Snow's United States Sample Express Co. v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1917-04-19· cited 20×
• Rogers v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1926-04-17· cited 19×
• Redden v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1915-01-15· cited 12×
• Carr v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1921-02-17· cited 4×