Schweitzer v. Schweitzer (In Re Schweitzer)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Spouses are no longer required to participate in the bankruptcy proceedings to preserve their rights to enforce such marital obligations. Federal courts have consistently interpreted the 2005 amendments as written.”
• \Spouses are no longer required to participate in the bankruptcy proceedings to preserve their rights to enforce such marital obligations. Federal courts have consistently interpreted the 2005 amendments as written.\
• debtor’s obligation to hold former spouse harmless on mortgage did not create a support obligation where debtor was awarded exclusive use of the marital residence and the separation agreement provided that neither party owed spousal support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).