· 6/28/1996
Schwartz v. Custom Printing Co.
Citations
- 926 S.W.2d 490
- 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1189
- 1996 WL 360986
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff lacked standing to bring a derivative action because he lost his right to hold shares in the corporation as soon as he was terminated
- cardinal rule in contract interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to parties’ intent, which is to be gathered from contract itself where it is unambiguous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gary M. Gaertner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.