Skip to main content
· 6/28/1996

Schwartz v. Custom Printing Co.

Citations

  • 926 S.W.2d 490
  • 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1189
  • 1996 WL 360986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff lacked standing to bring a derivative action because he lost his right to hold shares in the corporation as soon as he was terminated
  • cardinal rule in contract interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to parties’ intent, which is to be gathered from contract itself where it is unambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gary M. Gaertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.