State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Esswein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where appellant argued in its appellate brief for reformation of a policy on two theories that were not presented to the trial court, the new theories \are stricken because they were not preserved for consideration by this court\
• finding \[al party on appeal generally 'must stand or fall by the theory on which he tried and submitted his case in the court below\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).