Skip to main content

Schultz v. Schultz

Citations

  • 591 N.W.2d 212
  • 1999 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 54
  • 1999 WL 160192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the award under a divorce decree of an IRA to one spouse does not terminate “the other spouse’s expectancy interest as the designated beneficiary of that asset” absent language in the decree indicating that the court intended to affect the expectancy interest
  • “Iowa follows the majority rule that ‘divorce or dissolution per se does not void the designation of a named spouse on a life insurance policy.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Key, System, McGiverin, Lavorato, Snell, Ternus, Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.