Skip to main content
· 3/14/2001

PaineWebber Inc. v. East

Citations

  • 768 A.2d 1029
  • 363 Md. 408
  • 2001 Md. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, “In appeals from grants of summary judgment, Maryland appellate courts, as a general rule, will consider only the grounds upon which the lower court relied in granting summary judgment.”
  • stating that, “In appeals from grants of summary judgment, Maryland appellate courts, as a general rule, will consider only the grounds upon which the lower court relied in granting summary judgment.”
  • finding a named beneficiary of an IRA account should be paid “as a third-party beneficiary” of the contract
  • separation agreement that did not expressly refer to wife’s rights as named beneficiary of husband’s individual retirement account would not foreclose wife’s contract claim as beneficiary
  • “In appeals from grants of summary judgment, Maryland appellate courts, as a general rule, will consider only the grounds upon which the lower court relied in granting summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Harrell, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.