Schultz v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court properly denied the plaintiff’s request for additional discovery under Rule 191(b) where the affidavit failed to set forth what the prospective witness would testify to
• rejecting request for further discovery based on Rule 191(b) affidavit that did not specify what prospective evidence would show

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).