Traharne v. Wayne/Scott Fetzer Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that expert’s opinions should be excluded because he did not inspect the items involved in an accident, noting that an “expert is not always required to personally perceive the subject of his analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).