Schultz Ex Rel. Schultz v. Gould Academy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a boarding school that provided security staff to protect its residents could be held liable for a failure to provide security “even though a wilful or negligent or criminal act by a third person intervened and contributed to the harm”
• reinstating a jury verdict resulting from the sexual assault of a student in a school dormitory
• finding a duty owed to a 16-year-old student at Gould Academy who was assaulted by an unidentified intruder who entered her dorm room while she was sleeping

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).