Kimple v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury could conclude that defendant had knowledge of facts that should have placed him on notice that a group of patrons may injure other guests in a nightclub because the group had been drinking heavily, were loud and boisterous, and had started a prior fight
• holding a tavern owner liable for plaintiffs’ injuries from assault by other patrons for failing to call the police even though tavern employees were repeatedly urged by plaintiffs and other patrons to do so because “trouble [was] expected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).