· 12/9/1998
Schroeder v. Rynel, Ltd., Inc.
Citations
- 1998 ME 259
- 720 A.2d 1164
- 1998 Me. LEXIS 291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the court would enforce a Delaware choice of law provision in an employment contract where the employer was incorporated in Delaware and the parties were aware of the well-established body of law in Delaware
- finding a substantial relationship to Ohio because one party was incorporated and had its principal place of business there
- “If parties choose a state’s laws to govern because of that state’s well- 42. known and established body of law, then a court will enforce that choice of law provision.”
- “Incorporation in a state constitutes a substantial relationship.”
- “Incorporation in a state constitutes a substantial relationship.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Saufley, Alexander, Calkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.