Skip to main content
· 12/9/1998

Schroeder v. Rynel, Ltd., Inc.

Citations

  • 1998 ME 259
  • 720 A.2d 1164
  • 1998 Me. LEXIS 291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the court would enforce a Delaware choice of law provision in an employment contract where the employer was incorporated in Delaware and the parties were aware of the well-established body of law in Delaware
  • finding a substantial relationship to Ohio because one party was incorporated and had its principal place of business there
  • “If parties choose a state’s laws to govern because of that state’s well- 42. known and established body of law, then a court will enforce that choice of law provision.”
  • “Incorporation in a state constitutes a substantial relationship.”
  • “Incorporation in a state constitutes a substantial relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Saufley, Alexander, Calkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.