Donovan v. Bank of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim under § 1681s-2(b) requires the plaintiff to identify “information 25 that a reasonable investigation would have uncovered . . . that would have cast doubt” on the 26 furnisher’s report to the CRA
• holding that the U.C.C. displaced a common-law negligence claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).