Schroeder v. DiPascal Cabinet Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mitigation not applicable where no further damage occurred following cabinet refinisher’s breach in rendition of services to plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-04-19· cited 84×
• First Bank & Trust v. Redman Gaming of Louisiana, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-12-12· cited 17×
• Whitney Bank v. Garden Gate New Orleans, L.L.C.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2017-12-27· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perniciaro v. Brinch
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-05-19· cited 179×
• Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-05-17· cited 119×
• Unverzagt v. Young Builders, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1968-11-12· cited 67×
• Arrow Fence Co. v. DeFrancesch
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1985-03-11· cited 27×
• Juan v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-06-11· cited 19×
• Aultman v. Rinicker
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-06-15· cited 19×
• Rogers v. Nelson Dodge, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1981-11-10· cited 16×
• Goudeau v. Hill
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-02-09· cited 8×
• Juan v. Harris
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1972-06-06· cited 6×