Skip to main content

Schrock v. Albert Einstein Medical Center

Citations

  • 589 A.2d 1103
  • 527 Pa. 191
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • instructing that Rule 238 as revised in 1988 applied to future actions and to pending actions where delay damages have not yet been determined
  • Delay damages may be assessed even if defendant is free from fault in delay of trial
  • delay damages may be assessed even if defendant is free from fault in delay of trial
  • fundamental fairness requires that plaintiffs receive interest on what is essentially then-money for the period defendants held it until trial
  • “Under former Rule 238, interest was calculated at 10% per annum.... Under revised Rule 238, interest is calculated at the rate equal to the prime rate ... plus one percent_”
  • “[T]he mere fact that a defendant is not at fault in causing the delay in a case does not automatically relieve the defendant from being assessed delay damages under Rule 238.... [W]hen both parties are blameless it would be unreasonable and unjust to deny delay damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Nix

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Schrock v. Albert Einstein Medical Center

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.