· 8/16/1994
Schrader v. Eli Lilly and Co.
Citations
- 639 N.E.2d 258
- 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1830
- 1994 Ind. LEXIS 101
- 1994 WL 440659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no excessive publication where 1,500 employees were notified about plaintiffs termination
- “Once the No. 08‐3084 Page 3 communication is established as qualifiedly privileged, the plaintiff then has the burden of overcoming that privilege by showing that it has been abused.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: DeBRULER, Dickson, Givan, Shepard, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.