Jones v. Res-Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “unfair reprimands or negative performance evaluations, unaccompanied by some tangible job consequence” are not adverse employment actions
• stating that “unfair reprimands or negative performance evaluations, unaccompanied by some tangible job consequence” are not adverse employment actions
• noting in the context of a claim for retaliation “unfair reprimands or negative performance evaluations, unaccompanied by some tangible job consequence, do not constitute adverse employment actions.” (quoting Grube v. Lau Indus., Inc., 257 F.3d 723, 729 (7th Cir. 2001))
• “[U]nfair reprimands or negative performance evaluations, unaccompanied 83 See Taplor-Novotny v. Health All, Med. Plans, Inc., 772 F.3d 478, 492 (7th Cir, 2014
• “[U]nfair reprimands or negative performance evaluations, unaccompanied by some tangible job consequence, do not constitute adverse employment actions.”
• \[T]he law precludes recovery for those discrete acts that occur outside the relevant statute of limitations[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).