Skip to main content

Schor v. FMS Financial Corp.

Citations

  • 814 A.2d 1108
  • 357 N.J. Super. 185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where a contract’s language is “clear and unambiguous,” the court must “enforce those terms as written”
  • explaining where a contract’s language is ambiguous, parties may “introduce proof of extrinsic circumstances bearing on the alleged proper interpretation of the language used”
  • “A party that uses unambiguous terms in a contract cannot be relieved from the language simply because it had a secret, unexpressed intent that the language should have an interpretation contrary to the words’ plain meaning.”
  • stating courts give contractual terms their plain and ordinary meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, Coburn and Alley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.