Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Checchio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a court deciding a summary judgement motion \is obliged to set forth factual findings and correlate them to legal conclusions\
• explaining a court deciding a summary- judgment motion \is obliged to set forth factual findings and correlate them to legal conclusions\
• explaining a court reviewing a summary judgment order must measure the trial court's \factual findings\ correlated to its legal conclusions \against the standards set forth in \ Brill, 142 N.J. at 540
• explaining a court reviewing a summary-judgment order must measure the trial court's \factual findings\ correlated to its legal conclusions \against the standards set forth in\ A-0605-22 32 Brill, 142 N.J. at 540
• reversing summary judgment where, among other reasons, the motion judge provided no basis for denying requested oral argument and the Appellate Division gleaned no basis from the record to relax Rule 1:6-2(d)
• reversing summary judgment where the trial court did not conduct oral argument, which was requested by the moving party, because the court did not find any basis for A-0274-21 5 relaxing the rule and the judge provided no basis for denial in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).