Schoenfeld v. Quamme

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff “was on liberty” and “not engaged in military activity when he was injured” and that “the military did not require” him to engage in the activity that injured him
• defining benefits awarded for purposes of this prong as the “compensation received on account of the resulting injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).