Skip to main content
· 5/15/1911

Dreier v. United States

Citations

  • 221 U.S. 394
  • 31 S. Ct. 550
  • 55 L. Ed. 784
  • 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1741

Syllabus

<p>Wilson v. United States, ante, p. 361, followed to effect that an officer of a corporation cannot refuse to produce books and papers, of the corporation in response to a subpoena duces tecum on the ground that the contents thereof would tend to incriminate him personally.'</p> <p>Quaere whether if a privilege to refuse to produce documents of a corporation in response to a subpoena duces tecum does exist the person entitled to claim it may not waive it by his conduct.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding corporate officer subpoenaed to produce records of a corporation could not assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination with respect to the corporate records
  • same for subpoena issued to officer of corporation demanding production of corporate records in his custody
  • officer of corporation could not claim privilege against self-incrimina tion where subpoena seeking corporate books and records was directed to the individual corporate officer
  • custodian may have \voluntarily assumed a duty which overrides his claim of privilege\
  • custodian may have “voluntarily assumed a duty which overrides his claim of privilege”
  • subpoena requiring production of corporate books was directed to individual corporate officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hughes, McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.