Schneider v. Schneider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that perjured testimony at trial did not constitute extrinsic fraud, especially when both parties had independent counsel during the creation of their separation agreement and subsequent divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hresko v. Hresko
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-01· cited 13×
• Oxendine v. SLM Capital Corp.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-30· cited 4×
• Facey v. Facey
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-02-26· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pico v. Cohn
  California Supreme Court· 1891-09-10· cited 286×
• Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-29· cited 57×
• Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-26· cited 34×
• Master v. Master
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-12-14· cited 32×
• Cramer v. Wildwood Development Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-12-05· cited 17×
• Pugh v. Waclawski
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-31· cited 14×
• Kaylor v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-08· cited 13×
• Capobianco v. Gordon
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-01-07· cited 11×
• Vierling v. Holt
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1951-04-12· cited 7×
• Gray v. Gray
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-12· cited 6×