Skip to main content
· 12/14/1960

Master v. Master

Citations

  • 166 A.2d 251
  • 223 Md. 618
  • 1960 Md. LEXIS 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that conversation between husband and wife was not confidential because it took place in the presence of children old enough to understand what was being said
  • “We find nothing confidential in the challenged communication of the husband to the wife. It was made in the presence of children old enough to understand fully what was being said.”
  • where Judge Hammond, later Chief Judge, affirmed the propriety of an original proceeding to vacate an enrolled decree for fraud against an attempt to “snipe” at the right tó do so
  • \It has been held that more than a mere prayer for declaratory relief is required in a pleading if the jurisdiction of the court to declare rights and status is to be invoked.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruñe, Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.