Schmidt v. Schmidt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that absent a stay or injunction pending appeal a trial court’s judgment is enforceable against the appellant
• dismissing an appeal where the appellant was in contempt for refusing to deposit the full amount of funds ordered into an escrow account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wheeler v. Wheeler
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-16· cited 12×
• Scelba v. Scelba
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-17· cited 11×
• Acierno v. Hayward
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2004-10-04· cited 11×
• DiSabatino v. Salicete
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1996-08-12· cited 6×
• DeMauro v. DeMauro
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-03-08· cited 5×
• Arroyo v. Arroyo
  Delaware Family Court· 2008-11-17· cited 1×
• Newman v. DCSE/Eva Durkin
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-12-20· cited 1×
• Andrews v. Andrews
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-09-24
• Layton & Costas v. Layton
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2018-10-23
• Allen v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-04-08
• DNARx LLC v. Kaufman
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2024-04-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Greenwood v. Greenwood
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 28×
• duPont v. duPont
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1954-03-01· cited 12×
• Redden v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1980-06-25· cited 8×