Skip to main content
· 7/17/2000

Scelba v. Scelba

Citations

  • 535 S.E.2d 668
  • 342 S.C. 223
  • 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the fugitive disentitlement doctrine where the appellant did not comply with a court order and was held in contempt for her failure to appear at multiple hearings
  • applying the fugitive disentitlement doctrine where the appellant did not comply with a court order and was held in contempt for her failure to appear at multiple hearings
  • applying the fugitive disentitlement doctrine where the appellant did not comply with a court order and was held in contempt for her failure to appear at multiple hearings
  • applying a similar “fugitive disentitlement doctrine” as an exercise of inherent contempt power to dismiss the appeal of a fugitive appellant where the fugitive status was connected to the appellate process being sought
  • dismissing the appeal where, in light of appellant’s continued disobedience of court orders, the court took “a dim view of the possibility that she will voluntarily return ... or otherwise cooperate with any order she does not fancy”
  • dismissing the appeal where, in light of appellant’s continued disobedience of court orders, the court took “a dim view of the possibility that she will voluntarily return . . . or otherwise cooperate with any order she does not fancy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Cureton, Shuler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.