Schlosser v. Jursich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “individuals are presumed to have contracted with knowledge of existing law”
• \individuals are presumed to have contracted with knowledge of existing law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Balla v. Gambro, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-12-19· cited 96×
• Wright v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-11· cited 39×
• S & D Service, Inc. v. 915-925 W. Schubert Condominium Ass'n
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-04-23· cited 35×
• Bloese v. Board of Education
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-20· cited 8×
• City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Board of Trustees
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-05-17· cited 7×
• In re Moran
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-12-01

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neville v. Davinroy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-09-02· cited 38×
• Board of Regents v. Wilson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-04-08· cited 34×
• Goble v. Central Security Mutual Insurance
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-07-13· cited 29×
• In Re Broverman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-05-29· cited 17×
• Thompson v. Reynolds
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1874-09-15· cited 16×
• Bounougias v. Peters
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-04-15· cited 15×
• Mock v. Higgins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1954-10-05· cited 11×
• West Chicago Park Commissioners v. Coleman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1884-01-23· cited 11×
• Middle East Trading & Marine Service, Inc. v. Mercantile Financial Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-04-20· cited 6×