Wright v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there is a strong presumption against provisions that could have easily been included in a contract, but were not
• explaining that where a contract is clear and unambiguous, a court will not add terms to reach a more equitable result
• adding terms where the contract is silent amounts to rewriting the contract
• “There is a strong presumption against provisions that easily could have been included in the contract but were not.”
• \There is a strong presumption against provisions that easily could have been included in the contract but were not.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).