· 2/1/1996
Schenck v. Edwards
Citations
- 921 F. Supp. 679
- 1996 WL 144246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Based on Hudson and Mitchell, the plaintiff does not have a constitutional claim pertaining to the inspection of legal papers outside of his presence during the course of a cell search.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Suko
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.