Scheiding v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Law; holding LIA preempted state-law defective-design and failure-to-warn claims against manufacturer
• product-liability actions against a manufacturer of locomotives containing asbestos materials were preempted under the FLIA
• Boiler Inspection Act preempts employees’ product-liability actions against a manufacturer of locomotives containing asbestos materials
• \ Napier has long established [that] Congress `intended to occupy the field' of locomotive equipment\
• Boiler Inspection Act preempts employees’ product liability actions against a manufacturer of locomotives containing asbestos materials
• finding FLIA preempts employees products liability claim against locomotive manufacture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2012-02-29· cited 135×
• People v. Diaz
  California Supreme Court· 2011-01-03· cited 90×
• Kurns v. A.W. Chesterton Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2010-09-09· cited 61×
• Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.
  California Supreme Court· 2017-07-27· cited 58×
• Darby v. A-Best Products Co.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-07-28· cited 48×
• Canadian National/Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. Hall
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2007-04-12· cited 40×
• General Motors Corp. v. Kilgore
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2002-12-20· cited 34×
• In Re West Virginia Asbestos Litigation
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 18×
• Wright v. General Electric Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2007-11-30· cited 11×
• Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Denson
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-06-16· cited 11×
• Forrester v. American Dieselelectric, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-07-10· cited 9×
• Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Bogle
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2006-03-30· cited 8×
• Frastaci v. Vapor Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-21· cited 6×
• BNSF Railway Co. v. Seats, Inc.
  D. Nebraska· 2017-01-23· cited 1×
• Forrester v. American Dieselelectric
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-07-10
• Canadian National/Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. James Wesley Hall
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2004-10-22
• Friends of the Eel River v. N. Coast RR. Auth.
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-09-29
• Friends of the Eel River v. N. Coast RR. Auth.
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-10-17

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
  Supreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 2,980×
• Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 2,631×
• Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 2,291×
• Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
• Agostini v. Felton
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 1,924×
• English v. General Electric Co.
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,390×
• Urie v. Thompson
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 1,351×
• Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-11· cited 1,181×
• CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-21· cited 1,080×
• Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1963-01-24· cited 1,019×
• Keene Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
• Finley v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 708×
• Mandel v. Bradley
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 444×
• Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1964-04-21· cited 384×
• Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-29· cited 336×
• Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Groeger
  Supreme Court· 1925-01-05· cited 208×
• Southern Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of Indiana
  Supreme Court· 1915-02-23· cited 161×
• United Transportation Union v. Long Island Rail Road
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-24· cited 135×
• Pennsylvania Railroad v. Public Service Commission
  Supreme Court· 1919-11-10· cited 127×
• Mary Marshall, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-11-25· cited 91×

Other cases named Scheiding v. General Motors Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Scheiding v. General Motors Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2000-10-30