Mary Marshall, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Burlington Northern, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that federal preemption attaches when \a federal decision is reached through the local agency on the adequacy of the warning devices at the crossing\
• suggesting that federal preemption attaches when “a federal decision is reached through the local agency on the adequacy of the warning devices at the crossing”
• “Lunsford in no way affects our holding that the Boiler Inspection Act preempts any state regulation of locomotive equipment.”
• “[The railroad] therefore, complied as a matter of law with its duty to provide locomotive warning devices when it met the requirements of [§§ 229.125, 229.129].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).