Skip to main content
· 1/11/1961

Schauland v. Schmaltz

Citations

  • 107 N.W.2d 68
  • 252 Iowa 426
  • 1961 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While practical location was not in express terms pleaded or argued by the plaintiffs, they did plead and argue estoppel, which is sufficient to bring the rule of estoppel by practical location before us, if the facts in the record show it.”
  • “While practical location was not in express terms pleaded or argued by the plaintiffs, they did plead and argue estoppel, which is sufficient to bring the rule of estoppel by practical location before us, if the facts in the record show it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.